[Python-Dev] Dict access with double-dot (syntactic sugar)
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Mar 24 18:50:51 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 24 18:50:51 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Dict access with double-dot (syntactic sugar)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dict access with double-dot (syntactic sugar)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, fair enough. People don't like this. So let me back up a step. > Clearly this is intended for using with things that you get as a dictionary, > but which really should be namespaces. The top two cases of that are parsed > json objects and **kw arguments. If you need this for **kw arguments maybe you're not using them right; why not name your arguments if you're going to reference them by name? The JSON use case seems to be driven because this is the way JavaScript does things -- they don't distinguish between dicts and objects. I personally think that's a poor language feature: it blurs a line that should be clear, between data (dict keys) and program variables (attributes). -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Dict access with double-dot (syntactic sugar)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dict access with double-dot (syntactic sugar)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list