PJ Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sat Nov 5 03:24:52 CET 2011

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Inline the advisory text on how to use the shelve module.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 October 2011 18:04, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote:
> > Has anyone analyzed the current packages on PyPI to see how many provide
> > binary distributions and in what format?
>
> A very quick and dirty check:
>
> dmg: 5
> rpm: 12
> msi: 23
> dumb: 132
> wininst: 364
> egg: 2570
>
> That's number of packages with binary distributions in that format.
> It's hard to be sure about egg distributions, as many of these could
> be pure-python (there's no way I know, from the PyPI metadata, to
> check this).
>

FYI, the egg filename will contain a distutils platform identifier (e.g.
'win32', 'macosx', 'linux', etc.)  after the 'py2.x' tag if the egg is
platform-specific.  Otherwise, it's pure Python.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111104/a9718e30/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Inline the advisory text on how to use the shelve module.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list