[Python-Dev] [SPAM: 3.000] [issue11682] PEP 380 reference implementation for 3.3
Tim Delaney
timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 23:43:28 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Nov 9 23:43:28 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [SPAM: 3.000] [issue11682] PEP 380 reference implementation for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [SPAM: 3.000] [issue11682] PEP 380 reference implementation for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10 November 2011 09:13, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > This is patently untrue, because by version of the grammar > allows 'f(yield from x)', while disallowing 'f(yield x)'. > > I made a conscious decision to do that, and I'm a bit alarmed > at this decision being overridden at the last moment with no > debate. We have precedent for being more restrictive initially, and relaxing those restrictions later. I suggest that the more restrictive implementation go in now so that people can start playing with it. If the discussion comes to a consensus on more relaxed syntax, that can be added later (either in 3.3 or a later release). Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111110/3c33d1ea/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [SPAM: 3.000] [issue11682] PEP 380 reference implementation for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [SPAM: 3.000] [issue11682] PEP 380 reference implementation for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list