[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Nov 24 19:29:33 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Nov 24 19:29:33 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:15:25 +0200 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > > Oops, readinto takes the same time as copying. This is a real shame, > because readinto in conjunction with the buffer interface was supposed to > avoid the redundant copy. > > Is there a real performance regression here, is this a well-known issue, or > am I just missing something obvious? Can you try with latest 3.3 (from the default branch)? Thanks Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list