[Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Dec 3 23:37:13 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Dec 3 23:37:13 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 03, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Larry Hastings wrote: >4) Builtin function arguments are defined in a small DSL; these > are expanded to code and data using a custom compile-time > preprocessor step. > >All the core devs I've asked said "given all that, I'd prefer the >hairy preprocessor macros". But by the end of the conversation >they'd changed their minds to prefer the custom DSL. Maybe I'll >make a believer out of you too--read on! The biggest question with generated code is always the effect on debugging. How horrible will it be when I have to step through argument parsing to figure out what's going wrong? -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list