Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 07:25:46 CET 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Accept just PEP-0426
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:

> I get the sneaking suspicion that I'm going to rewrite Clinic to run under
> either Python 2.7 or 3,
>

For bootstrapping purposes, isn't it enough to just ignore the checksums if
there's no Python interpreter already built? We can have a commit hook that
rejects a checkin if the checksums don't match so you can't push a change
if you've modified the headers without regenerating them.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121205/16a546ff/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Accept just PEP-0426
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list