[Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration
Dino Viehland
dinov at microsoft.com
Tue Dec 11 20:37:13 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Dec 11 20:37:13 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration
- Next message: [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
PJ wrote: > Actually, IronPython may already have ordered dictionaries by default; see: > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/2006- > May/002319.html > > It's described as an implementation detail that may change, perhaps that > could be changed to being unchanging. ;-) > I think this has changed since 2006. IronPython was originally using the .NET dictionary class and just locking while using it, but it now has a custom dictionary which is thread safe for multiple readers and allows 1 writer. But it doesn't do anything to preserve order of insertions. OTOH changing certain dictionaries in IronPython (such as keyword args) to be ordered would certainly be possible. Personally I just wouldn't want to see it be the default as that seems like unnecessary overhead when the specialized class exists.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration
- Next message: [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list