[Python-Dev] Mercurial workflow question...
Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 06:17:08 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Dec 17 06:17:08 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial workflow question...
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial workflow question...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 13, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdonek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:48 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:21:24 -0500, Trent Nelson <trent at snakebite.org> wrote: >>> - Use a completely separate clone to house all the intermediate >>> commits, then generate a diff once the final commit is ready, >>> then apply that diff to the main cpython repo, then push that. >>> This approach is fine, but it seems counter-intuitive to the >>> whole concept of DVCS. >> >> Perhaps. But that's exactly what I did with the email package changes >> for 3.3. >> >> You seem to have a tension between "all those dirty little commits" and >> "clean history" and the fact that a dvcs is designed to preserve all >> those commits...if you don't want those intermediate commits in the >> official repo, then why is a diff/patch a bad way to achieve that? > > Right. And you usually have to do this beforehand anyways to upload > your changes to the tracker for review. > > Also, for the record (not that anyone has said anything to the > contrary), our dev guide says, "You should collapse changesets of a > single feature or bugfix before pushing the result to the main > repository. The reason is that we don’t want the history to be full of > intermediate commits recording the private history of the person > working on a patch. If you are using the rebase extension, consider > adding the --collapse option to hg rebase. The collapse extension is > another choice." > > (from http://docs.python.org/devguide/committing.html#working-with-mercurial ) Does hg's ability to "make merges easier than svn" depend on having all the intermediate commits? I thought the theory was that the smaller changesets provided extra information that made it possible to merge two expansive groups of changes. Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial workflow question...
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial workflow question...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list