[Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 00:20:01 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jul 18 00:20:01 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> It's the JIT compiler of Unladen Swallow that "failed"; in > my understanding because LLVM is crap (i.e. it is slow, memory-consuming, > and buggy) - as a low-level virtual machine; it may be ok as a compiler > backend (but I still think it is buggy there as well). What is the status of LLVM nowadays? Is it not a good solution to write a portable JIT? I don't want to write my own library to generate machine code. >> psyco is no more maintained. > > I think this is factually incorrect: Christian Tismer maintains it (IIUC). http://psyco.sourceforge.net/ says: "News, 12 March 2012 Psyco is unmaintained and dead. Please look at PyPy for the state-of-the-art in JIT compilers for Python." Victor
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list