[Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
Ronald Oussoren
ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Wed Jul 18 17:15:18 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jul 18 17:15:18 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] clang
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18 Jul, 2012, at 16:59, martin at v.loewis.de wrote: > > Zitat von Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com>: > >> On 18 Jul, 2012, at 7:53, martin at v.loewis.de wrote: >> >>>> What is the status of LLVM nowadays? Is it not a good solution to >>>> write a portable JIT? >>> >>> I don't think it is. It is still slow and memory hungry. The fact that >>> the version that Apple ships with Xcode still miscompiles Python 3.3 >>> tells me that it is still buggy. >> >> Does it miscompile? > > I'm talking about the bug in > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113731.html > >> I regularly run the 3.3 testsuite using the latest Xcode from the Appstore on a OSX Lion machine and that works properly. > > I'm not actually using the latest Xcode. So if you could test my test > program, that would be much appreciated. That bug in llvm-gcc still exists, and is unlikely to get fixed. That's a bug in the integretion of the GCC frontend and LLVM backend, clang (LLVM project frontend + LLVM backend) does work. Ronald -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4788 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120718/83af4f5a/attachment.bin>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] clang
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list