[Python-Dev] Sandboxing Python
Armin Rigo
arigo at tunes.org
Thu Mar 8 07:00:26 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 8 07:00:26 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Sandboxing Python
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Sandboxing Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Stefan, Stefan Behnel wrote: > could you please stop bashing CPython for no good reason, especially on > python-dev? Specifically, to call it broken beyond repair is a rather > offensive claim, especially when made in public. Sorry if you were offended. I am just trying to point out that CPython has a rather large number of *far-fetched* corner cases in which it is broken. (If this is news to anyone, sorry, but examples have been part of the CPython source tree for years and years.) This is of course very different from saying that CPython is generally broken --- I don't think anyone here considers that it is. My point is merely to repeat that CPython is not suited to be the (only) line of defence in any place that needs serious security. I personally think that the removal of 'rexec' back around Python 2.3(?) was a good idea, as such tools give people a false sense of security. A bientôt, Armin.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Sandboxing Python
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Sandboxing Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list