[Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Mar 11 21:53:31 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Mar 11 21:53:31 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > How does someone know if something in CPython is an implementation detail or > not? Sadly, there's a large grey area where the language reference doesn't have enough rigor, so asking here is often the only way. > In the case of im_func, I think it is (an implementation detail), and > another person thinks it is part of the language spec. That all > implementations must have. It's part of the language spec. However it's now called __func__. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list