[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 14 10:39:41 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 14 10:39:41 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:31:34 +0800 Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote: > > Rather than indicating apathy on the party of third party developers, this > might be a sign that core Python is unapproachable or not worth the effort. > > For instance I have several one line patches languishing, I can't imagine > how disappointing it would be to have significantly larger patches ignored, > but it happens. Can you give a pointer to these one-liners? Once a patch gets a month old or older, it tends to disappear from everyone's radar unless you somehow "ping" on the tracker, or post a message to the mailing-list. (of course, you shouldn't spam the list with open issues either) Thanks Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list