[Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 14 13:27:47 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 14 13:27:47 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:27:19 +0100 Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > > monotonic() may not be the best name in this case. Jeffrey Yasskin > proposed time.steady_clock(), so time.steady_clock(monotonic=False)? I don't know what "steady" is supposed to mean here, so perhaps the best solution is to improve the doc? Also, "monotonic=False" implies that it won't be monotonic, which is false. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list