Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 14 17:40:19 CET 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:26:09 +0800
Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you give a pointer to these one-liners?
> > Once a patch gets a month old or older, it tends to disappear from
> > everyone's radar unless you somehow "ping" on the tracker, or post a
> > message to the mailing-list.
> 
> All of these can be verified with a few minutes of checking the
> described code paths.
> 
> http://bugs.python.org/issue13839
> http://bugs.python.org/issue13872
> http://bugs.python.org/issue12684
> http://bugs.python.org/issue13694

Thanks. You did get some comments and answers on some of these issues,
though (especially on http://bugs.python.org/issue13872 ).

Regards

Antoine.

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list