[Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Mar 15 23:45:25 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 15 23:45:25 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/15/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Matt Joiner<anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote: >> +1. I now prefer time.monotonic(), no flags. > > Am I alone thinking that an adjective is an odd choice for a function > name? I would normally agree, but in this case, it is a function of a module whose short name names what the adjective is modifying. I expect that this will normally be called with the module name. > I think monotonic_clock or monotonic_time would be a better option. time.monotonic_time seems redundant. -- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list