[Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32
Tim Golden
mail at timgolden.me.uk
Tue Mar 20 15:26:59 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 20 15:26:59 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20/03/2012 14:08, VanL wrote: > On 3/20/2012 5:48 AM, Mark Hammond wrote: >> While I'm still unclear on the actual benefits of this, Martin's >> approach strikes a reasonable compromise so I withdraw my objections. > > > Ok. I was out of town and so could not respond to most of the latest > discussion. > > A question for you Mark, Paul, (and anyone else): Éric correctly points > out that there are actually two distinct changes proposed here: > > 1. Moving the Python binary > 2. Changing from "Scripts" to "bin" > > So far, the primary resistance seems to be to item #1 - moving the > python binary. There have been a few people who have noted that #2 will > require some code to change (i.e. Paul), but I don't see lots of > resistance. Speaking for myself, I think that's true. At present I tend to add /scripts to my path and I can just as easily add /bin (for whatever version I'm running most often on that machine). TJG
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list