Home Original page

[Python-Dev] PEP 411 - request for pronouncement

Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 08:48:33 CEST 2012 
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:40, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:53, Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:51, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The PEP received mostly positive feedback. The only undecided point is
>>> where to specify that the package is provisional. Currently the PEP
>>> mandates to specify it in the documentation and in the docstring.
>>> Other suggestions were to put it in the code, either as a
>>> __provisional__ attribute on the module, or collect all such modules
>>> in a single sys.provisional list.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the usecase is for checking in code if a module is
>> provisional or not. It doesn't seem useful, and risks being
>> unmaintained, especially when the flag is on the module itself.
>>
>
> Some usecases were given by Jim J. Jewett here:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116400.html
> (and +1-ed by a couple of others.)

Having a list of provisional modules seems the most helpful there, in
that case, and also noting that it is provisional in the module docs
shown when you do help().
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list