[Python-Dev] PEP 418: Add monotonic clock
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Tue Mar 27 02:16:52 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 27 02:16:52 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418: Add monotonic clock
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418: Add monotonic clock
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I started to write the PEP 418 to clarify the notions of monotonic and > steady clocks. > > The PEP is a draft and everyone is invited to contribute! time.steady() doesn't fit the benchmarking use case: it looks like we have to decide between stability and clock resolution. QueryPerformanceCounter() has a good resolution for benchmarking, but it is not monotonic and so GetTickCount64() would be used for time.steady(). GetTickCount64() is monotonic but has only a resolution of 1 millisecond. We might add a third new function which provides the most accurate clock with or without a known starting point. We cannot use QueryPerformanceCounter() to enhance time.time() resolution because it has an unknown starting point. Victor
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418: Add monotonic clock
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418: Add monotonic clock
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list