Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Fri Mar 30 00:45:10 CEST 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

2012/3/29 Brian Curtin <brian at python.org>:
> After talking with Martin and several others during the language
> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
> remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
> feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even
> need to continue the PEP process?

If you have a PEP and it's accepted, what would be the difference?



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list