[Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
Vinay Sajip
vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Mar 30 11:01:53 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Mar 30 11:01:53 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): Issue #14409: IDLE doesn't not execute commands from shell with default
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
<martin <at> v.loewis.de> writes: > Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly. > I thought you offered to rewrite it. Formally, I could accept the > PEP being withdrawn, and the feature integrated anyway, but I still > consider that bad style. > > So: I can offer to rewrite the PEP to give a full specification > of the feature. It might be that I still need some help to > provide end-user prose in the PEP if people would want to see that as > well. +1 to both your and Brian's input. I will aim to keep the implementation in sync with any changes required as a result of resolving open issues. Regards, Vinay Sajip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): Issue #14409: IDLE doesn't not execute commands from shell with default
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list