[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Tue May 8 02:57:24 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 8 02:57:24 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: >> As for build_class: at the moment the types module really only has types, >> and to add build_class there is just about as weird as in operator IMO. > > Oh no, types is definitely less weird - at least it's related to the > type system, whereas the operator module is about operator syntax > (attrgetter, itemgetter and index are at least related to the dot > operator and subscripting syntax) > > Benjamin's suggestion of a class method on type may be a good one, > though. Then the invocation (using all arguments) would be: > > mcl.build_class(name, bases, keywords, exec_body) > > Works for me, so unless someone else can see a problem I've missed, > we'll go with that. +1 -eric
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list