[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Tue May 8 18:50:44 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 8 18:50:44 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 08, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >No, the "mcl" in the call is just the designated metaclass - the >*actual* metaclass of the resulting class definition may be something >different. That's why this is a separate method from mcl.__new__. I'm not completely sold on adding a class method to type, but I acknowledge that it's a convenient place to put it. Still, it doesn't feel particularly more right than adding it to say, the operator module. I don't think we have any class methods on type yet, so this would be setting a precedence that we should be sure we want to establish. Cheers, -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list