Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed May 9 09:20:00 CEST 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Daniel Urban <urban.dani+py at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We need the explicitly declared metaclass as well as the bases in
>> order to determine the correct metaclass.
>
> Note, that the current patch (at http://bugs.python.org/issue14588)
> obtains the explicitly declared metaclass from the keywords dict
> (exactly like the class statement).

Ah, good point. In that case, consider me convinced: static method it
is. It can join mro() as the second non-underscore method defined on
type().

Regards,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list