Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Wed May 9 18:50:48 CEST 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Rietveld integration problem?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On May 09, 2012, at 08:51 AM, Eric Snow wrote:

>The type for sys.implementation has slowly shifted from the original
>proposal.  At this point it's settled into where I think it will stay,
>a custom type.  I've covered the choice of type in the rationale
>section.  However, there may be merit in not being so specific about
>the type.  I'll give that some thought.

Right.  See my previous follow up for what I think the PEP should say about
the semantics of the type, without being so specific about the actual type.

Cheers,
-Barry

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Rietveld integration problem?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list