Eric Snow ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sat May 12 20:02:14 CEST 2012

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/12/2012 08:04 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Eric Snow
>> <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If anyone has strong feelings for item-access over
>>> attribute-access, please elaborate.  I'm just not seeing it as that
>>> important and would rather finish up the PEP as simply as possible.
>>
>> I object to adding a new type to the stdlib just for this PEP. Since
>> iterating over the keys is significantly more useful than iterating
>> over the values, that suggests a dictionary as the most appropriate
>> type.
>
> Why would anyone want to iterate over either of them?

Nick gave a pretty good example [1].  I just don't think it's
necessary for the PEP.

-eric


[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119412.html

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list