Home Original page

[Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order

Daniel Holth dholth at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 21:07:10 CEST 2012 
Will add that the order is not significant. It is essentially a multidict.

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM,  <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> I'd like to request that PEP 426 is extended to talk about the order of
> fields.
> In particular, for the Extension field, is it necessary that all "additional
> tags"
> follow immediately the respective Extension field?
>
> I also request that RFC 2119 terminology is followed strictly. In
> particular,
> the phrasing "Additional tags defined by the extension should be of the form
> string/Name:"
> is unclear - under what "particular circumstances" can I deviate from that
> requirement, i.e. use some form other than string/Name?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list