[Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413?
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 16:30:25 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Oct 19 16:30:25 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] return type of __complex__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Oct 19, 2012, at 09:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>At the moment, with the "3.4" used throughout the examples in both >>PEPs, it's a little confusing w.r.t the actual 3.4 release PEP. I >>could live with "Deferred" instead of "Rejected", but one or the other >>should happen. > > I no longer have much interest (or frankly, time) to pursue PEP 407. Deferred > seems about right to me. Done - I marked them both as Deferred. If anyone is interested in doing so, we can pick them up again in a year or two, as I expect this isn't a question that will go away any time soon :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] return type of __complex__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list