[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
martin at v.loewis.de
martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Oct 27 22:58:26 CEST 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 27 22:58:26 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Zitat von Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com>: > To be clear - I'm *not* suggesting Cython become part of the required build > toolchain. But *if* the Cython-compiled extensions prove to be > significantly faster I'm thinking maybe it could become a semi-supported > option (e.g. a HOWTO with the caveat "it worked on this particular system"). This should compare to zipping the standard library, which has been a supported configuration for a long time, and also avoids many stat calls. Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list