[Python-Dev] One-line abstractmethod function?
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Fri Dec 6 04:07:09 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Dec 6 04:07:09 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One-line abstractmethod function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] One-line abstractmethod function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:33:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>> Actually if you want to support multiple inheritance of your ABC, your >>> abstract methods *must* be no-ops (or have some kind of default >>> behavior that can always be done last). > Done last or first really depends on what the default behavior is, doesn't > it? Using __new__ as an example, the chain of calls for that has the most > ancestorish (yeah, I just made that word up ;) method doing the work first, > with each less-ancestorish method building on to that as the call chain > unwinds. If you count which call *starts* first, the base class is always called later than the subclass (even if it finishes earlier :-). -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One-line abstractmethod function?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] One-line abstractmethod function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list