[Python-Dev] How do we feel about using pragmas and __attribute__ in C code?
Christian Heimes
christian at python.org
Fri Dec 13 18:43:20 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Dec 13 18:43:20 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] How do we feel about using pragmas and __attribute__ in C code?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (#19562) Asserts in Python stdlib code (datetime.py)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 13.12.2013 18:04, schrieb Brett Cannon: > http://bugs.python.org/issue12837 deals with the single compiler warning > left on OS X: a tautalogical compare in socketmodule.c that is valid > under POSIX. I have a solution that uses pragmas to turn off > tautological compare warnings for the single 'if' statement that > triggers it. But there are very few places in Python's code base which > use pragmas and I have never seen a discussion if we are okay with their > overall use. +1 We should aim for zero compiler warnings. You may have to wrap the pragma in a #ifdef __clang__ block to silence warnings: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Snow%20Leop%203.x/builds/830/steps/compile/logs/warnings%20%2822%29 > Tying into this and using compiler-specific things in C code, what about > __attribute__? http://bugs.python.org/issue19298 proposes an idea that > Daniel Stutzbach originally came up with where we could use __atribute__ > (behind a nicer macro) to help detect refleaks on PyObject* stack > variables. Would __attribute__ usage be okay in that situation? +1, too. Christian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] How do we feel about using pragmas and __attribute__ in C code?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (#19562) Asserts in Python stdlib code (datetime.py)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list