[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Feb 23 16:06:45 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Feb 23 16:06:45 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:02:31 +0100 Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote: > eli.bendersky <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > > +Ordered comparisons between enumeration values are *not* supported. Enums are > > +not integers! > > Hmm. I think this limits interoperation with C libraries and prototyping > C code. Agreed, this is a deal-breaker IMO. I'd actually argue that enums are not terribly useful apart from interacting with C constants. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list