[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Feb 25 05:14:10 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Feb 25 05:14:10 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 24, 2013, at 07:32 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>I would still like the int subclass, though, as it would be an aid to me on
>the Python side.
I think you'll know what I'm going to say. :)
1) Usually, you won't need it (see the responses from people who don't care
about the value).
2) When you do, wrapping the item in int() doesn't seem too bad to me.
>>> from flufl.enum import make
>>> Colors = make('Colors', 'red green blue'.split())
>>> int(Colors.blue)
3
Cheers,
-Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list