[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Tue Feb 26 21:16:35 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 26 21:16:35 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 02/26/2013 11:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:03:40 -0800 > Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> I'm beginning to see why enums as a class has not yet been added to Python. We don't want to complicate the language >> with too many choices, yet there is no One Obvious Enum to fit the wide variety of use-cases: >> >> - named int enums (http status codes) >> - named str enums (tkinter options) >> - named bitmask enums (file-type options) >> - named valueless enums (any random set of names) >> - named valueless-yet-orderable enums (any not-so-random set of names ;) > > I don't think valueless enums have a point. Just make them str enums. If they're str enums then they would compare equal with strings and be strings and that may not be desired. -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list