Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 12:21:59 CET 2013

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Feb 27, 2013, at 3:20 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> * security by obscurity in legal position of PSF towards contributors
>   https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
>    vs
>   http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://www.samurajdata.se/opensource/mirror/licenses/afl-2.1.php
>       or 
>   http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php
>    and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0 license
> 

I'm not even touching your security through obscurity trollbait, but I'd like to know how the PSF / Python core is non compliant with clause 4, and the legal counsel you spoke to to confirm this.

Jesse
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130228/6ac36c70/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list