[Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Jun 3 11:53:55 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jun 3 11:53:55 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:16:17 -0700 Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > 2013/5/18 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > > Calling finalizers only once is fine with me, but it would be a change > > in behaviour; I don't know if it may break existing code. > > I agree with Armin that this is better behavior. (Mostly significantly > consistent with weakrefs.) Keep in mind that it is a limitation of weakrefs, not a feature: you can't "unclear" a weakref. > > (for example, say someone is using __del__ to manage a freelist) > > Do you know if it breaks any of the projects you tested it with? I haven't tested it (yet). Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 442: Safe object finalization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list