[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Jun 26 18:18:08 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 26 18:18:08 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] End of the mystery "@README.txt Mercurial bug"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > - Deferred; see > + Rejected; see > + http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html > + > + This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060718.html > > Subsequent efforts to revive the PEP in April 2009 did not > meet with success because no syntax emerged that could > - compete with a while-True and an inner if-break. > + compete with the following form: > > - A syntax was found for a basic do-while loop but it found > - had little support because the condition was at the top: > + while True: > + <setup code> > + if not <condition>: > + break > + <loop body> > > - do ... while <cond>: > - <loop body> > + Users of the language are advised to use that form when a do-while > + loop would have been appropriate. Why delete the information about what was found wanting? --David
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] End of the mystery "@README.txt Mercurial bug"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list