[Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Tue Mar 5 20:49:00 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 5 20:49:00 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 05, 2013, at 02:11 AM, Donald Stufft wrote: >Doesn't setuptools/distribute already have a setup.py test command? That >seems like the easiest way forward? Yes, and in theory it can make `python setup.py test` work well. But there are lots of little details (such as API differences for ensuring that doctests run, "additional tests" discovery, etc.) that make this often not work so well in practice. Some of that is social and some of it is technical. I still claim that including test suite information in a package's metadata would be a win, but maybe that's just too much to hope for right now. -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list