Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Mar 20 20:40:07 CET 2013

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
• Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

> On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> >Agreed that the "sync into stdlib" think should not happen, or should at
> >best be a temporary measure until we can remove idle from the source
> >tarball (maybe at the 3.4 release, otherwise at 3.5).
>
> Right.  Ultimately, I think IDLE should be a separate project entirely,
> but I
> guess there's push back against that too.


I didn't hear any at the sprint here.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130320/e24189fd/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
• Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list