[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 20 23:11:47 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 20 23:11:47 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:05:40 -0700 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, the status quo of Idle is not something we should allow to > continue indefinitely, but decisions about its future development > should be made by active maintainers that are already trusted to make > changes to it (such as Terry and Roger), rather than those of us that > don't use it, and aren't interested in maintaining it. Definitely. People shouldn't remain quiescently torpid about the idle status quo. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list