[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
Mark Janssen
dreamingforward at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 04:03:28 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 21 04:03:28 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > Right. Ultimately, I think IDLE should be a separate project entirely, > but I > guess there's push back against that too. > > > The most important feature of IDLE is that it ships with the standard > library. > Everyone who clicks on the Windows MSI on the python.org webpage > automatically has IDLE. That is why I frequently teach Python with IDLE. > > If this thread results in IDLE being ripped out of the standard > distribution, > then I would likely never use it again. > > +1, FWIW MarkJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130320/8fe2d6c9/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list