[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Mar 21 19:13:00 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 21 19:13:00 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:57:54 -0700 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > > Right. Ultimately, I think IDLE should be a separate project entirely, but I > > guess there's push back against that too. > > The most important feature of IDLE is that it ships with the standard library. > Everyone who clicks on the Windows MSI on the python.org webpage > automatically has IDLE. That is why I frequently teach Python with IDLE. > > If this thread results in IDLE being ripped out of the standard distribution, > then I would likely never use it again. Which says a lot about its usefulness, if the only reason you use it is that it's bundled with the standard distribution. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list