[Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 434, Idle Enhancement Exception
Maciej Fijalkowski
fijall at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 13:35:44 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 30 13:35:44 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 434, Idle Enhancement Exception
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 434, Idle Enhancement Exception
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200 > Simon Cross <hodgestar+pythondev at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to >> alternative Python implementations. > > Why? I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any other implementation than CPython and it seems it won't work. It's a bit pity, but I guess if I felt really bad about it, I should just make it work. PS. are there idle projects in SoC? Maybe we should put a more pypy-friendly one there too? Cheers, fijal
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 434, Idle Enhancement Exception
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 434, Idle Enhancement Exception
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list