[Python-Dev] PEP-435 reference implementation
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Wed May 1 06:47:51 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed May 1 06:47:51 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP-435 reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP-435 reference implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 30, 2013, at 07:39 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: >>> Because Guido said no subclassing. > >Indeed, I heard him. But what I heard was that subclasses shouldn't be >allowed to define new enumeration values, and that was the point of all his >justification and the justifications in the Stack Overflow discussion he >linked to. I don't want to disagree, or argue that point, there are reasons >for it, although some have raised counter-arguments to it. This is not >intended to be a counter-argument to the point that there should be no new >enumeration values created in subclasses. That's a shame, because disallowing subclassing to extend an enum will break my existing use cases. Maybe I won't be able to adopt stdlib.enums after all. :( -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP-435 reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP-435 reference implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list