[Python-Dev] PEP 435: initial values must be specified? Yes
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon May 6 19:53:57 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon May 6 19:53:57 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 435: initial values must be specified? Yes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fighting the theoretical randomness of "is" on immutables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/06/2013 10:48 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 05.05.2013 22:09, schrieb Ethan Furman: > >> About the closest you going to be able to get is something like: >> >> def e(_next=[1]): >> e, _next[0] = _next[0], _next[0] + 1 >> return e >> >> class Color(Enum): >> red = e() >> green = e() >> blue = e() > > Uh, that's surely more nicely spelled as "e = itertools.count()"? Why, yes, I believe it is. :) -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 435: initial values must be specified? Yes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fighting the theoretical randomness of "is" on immutables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list