[Python-Dev] Tightening up the specification for locals()
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun May 12 15:28:47 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun May 12 15:28:47 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Tightening up the specification for locals()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Tightening up the specification for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:22:39 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > The exec case > corresponds to those two instances, depending on whether the single > namespace or dual namespace version is performed. I don't get the point. exec() *passes* a locals dictionary, but the compiled code itself isn't expected to use locals() as a way to access (let alone mutate) that dictionary. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Tightening up the specification for locals()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Tightening up the specification for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list