[Python-Dev] weak refs in descriptors (http://bugs.python.org/issue17950)
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon May 13 19:36:45 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon May 13 19:36:45 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] weak refs in descriptors (http://bugs.python.org/issue17950)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] How to debug python crashes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:21:17 -0400 Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 5/13/2013 9:20 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > > The strong reference there is a feature. Descriptors keep the class > > alive if somehow the class disappears and the descriptor itself does > > Is this feature stated or implied in the reference manual? > 3.3.2.1. Implementing Descriptors > 3.3.2.2. Invoking Descriptors > ??? > or is it an implementation detail that people have come to rely on? Any reference that is not documentedly weak is strong by definition; this is Python's basic semantics, there's no need to ask about documentation pointers. The only question is whether some people rely on this particular one. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] weak refs in descriptors (http://bugs.python.org/issue17950)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] How to debug python crashes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list