[Python-Dev] Issue 11406: adding os.scandir(), a directory iterator returning stat-like info
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Tue May 14 11:57:16 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 14 11:57:16 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Issue 11406: adding os.scandir(), a directory iterator returning stat-like info
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 11406: adding os.scandir(), a directory iterator returning stat-like info
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le Tue, 14 May 2013 21:10:08 +1200, Ben Hoyt <benhoyt at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On a locally running VM: > > os.walk took 0.400s, scandir.walk took 0.120s -- 3.3x as fast > > > > Same VM accessed from the host through a local sshfs: > > os.walk took 2.261s, scandir.walk took 2.055s -- 1.1x as fast > > > > Same, but with "sshfs -o cache=no": > > os.walk took 24.060s, scandir.walk took 25.906s -- 0.9x as fast > > Thanks. I take it those are "USING FAST C version"? Yes. > What is "-o cache=no"? I'm guessing the last one isn't giving dirents, > so my version is slightly slower than the built-in listdir/stat > version due to building and calling methods on the DirEntry objects in > Python. It disables sshfs's built-in cache (I suppose it's a filesystem metadata cache). The man page doesn't tell much more about it. > It should be no slower when it's all moved to C. The slowdown is too small to be interesting. The main point is that there was no speedup, though. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Issue 11406: adding os.scandir(), a directory iterator returning stat-like info
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 11406: adding os.scandir(), a directory iterator returning stat-like info
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list