[Python-Dev] Ordering keyword dicts
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon May 20 17:35:07 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon May 20 17:35:07 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Ordering keyword dicts
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Async subprocesses on Windows with tulip
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think that kills the "let's make all dicts ordered" idea, even for CPython. I wouldn't want people to start relying on this. The dict type should be clearly recognizable as the hash table it is. Making **kwds ordered is still open, but requires careful design and implementation to avoid slowing down function calls that don't benefit. --Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone) On May 20, 2013 8:25 AM, "fwierzbicki at gmail.com" <fwierzbicki at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > Or in other words, if dicts are to be ordered, let's make it an explicit > > language feature that we can measure compliance against. > Guaranteeing a dict order would be tough on Jython - today it's nice > that we can just have a thin wrapper around ConcurrentHashMap. In a > world with hard ordering guarantees I think we'd need to write our own > from scratch. > > -Frank > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130520/160d1402/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Ordering keyword dicts
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Async subprocesses on Windows with tulip
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list