[Python-Dev] performance testing recommendations in devguide
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed May 29 21:19:43 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed May 29 21:19:43 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] performance testing recommendations in devguide
- Next message: [Python-Dev] performance testing recommendations in devguide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Wed, 29 May 2013 21:59:21 +0300 Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com> wrote: > > [1] "pybench - run the standard Python PyBench benchmark suite. This is considered > an unreliable, unrepresentative benchmark; do not base decisions > off it. It is included only for completeness." "unrepresentative" is the main criticism against pybench. PyBench is a suite of micro-benchmarks (almost nano-benchmarks, actually :-)) that don't try to simulate any real-world situation. PyBench may also be unreliable, because its tests are so static that they could be optimized away by a clever enough (JIT) compiler. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] performance testing recommendations in devguide
- Next message: [Python-Dev] performance testing recommendations in devguide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list